Monday, May 26, 2008

When Neanderthals and Modern Humans Met, long book review Options

When Neanderthals and Modern Humans Met
Nicholas J. Conard (ed.)
Tübingen: Tübingen Publications in Prehistory, Kerns Verlag, 2006, 501
pp. (hardback), $68.50.
ISBN: 3935751036.
Reviewed by JULIEN RIEL-SALVATORE
Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Stephen Leacock
Building Rm. 717, 855 Sherbrooke St. W., Montréal, Québec H3A 2T7,
CANADA; julien.rielsalvat...@mail.mcgill.ca
When Neanderthals and Modern Humans Met comprises 20 papers first
presented in the context of a conference
held in Tübingen in 2004 on the nature of the interactions
between Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons (i.e., Homo sapiens sapiens)
during the interval commonly referred to as the Middle-Upper
Paleolithic Transition. Edited by Nicholas Conard, this book
constitutes a wide-ranging and eclectic (in the best sense of the
term) compendium of studies
representing where our understanding of the Middle-Upper Paleolithic
transition stands at the close of the first decade of the 21st
century. In that sense, the book's goal to present how far studies of
the interaction between Neanderthals
and modern humans--at least presumably, as the fossil record is all too
scant for this time period--have come since 1856 is met with great
success.
While the book's overall production value is very high, it does
contains a few typos and illustrations are of unequal quality across
contributions. This does not, however, detract
from the wealth of information it contains about the 'transitional'
record of Eurasia, from the Iberian Peninsula to the Russian plains,
and almost every point in between. As such, it is a must-have for the
library of any researcher seriously engaged in 'transition studies,'
as it provides not only abundant new data about the
paleoanthropological record of this crucial time period, but also some
new and very promising perspectives from which to approach what may
seem to some to have become a threadbare issue.
The volume opens with an introductory chapter by Conard who draws a
provocative pan-Eurasian picture of how contacts between Neanderthals
and modern humans--
when and where they happened--likely unfolded, and of the various
behavioral mechanisms which enabled modern humans to outcompete
Neanderthals throughout their range. This is followed by a paper by
Weniger who reviews broadly what the empirical record allows us to say
about population dynamics across the transition and that it is
important to base any interpretations first and foremost on those
coarse-grained data rather than on preconceived notions of how
Neanderthals must have disappeared. This theme is also touched upon by
Haidle, albeit from a very different perspective--she argues that
Neanderthals are consistently construed as the stereotypical "other"
in most narratives of modern human origins and that, as in many works
of fiction, prevalent scenarios about their interaction with modern
humans reflect tacit preconceptions and the tendency of framing
encounters in us-versus-them terms.
The next two chapters are among the best contributions
to the volume and are likely to become requisite reading
for all paleoanthropologists. In Chapter 4, O'Connell uses four cases,
drawn from ethnography and archaeology,
of replacement of one forager group by another to derive test
implications about what may have facilitated a replacement of
Neanderthal by modern humans in the Paleolithic. Although not
accounting for all of the nuances of the Early Upper Paleolithic
record, this approach admirably
highlights the proper referential basis on which we should be building
models of Pleistocene hunter-gatherer interactions, as opposed to
drawing from inappropriate analogies from European colonization of the
Americas and Australia. In Chapter 5, Hovers presents a very
thoughtful discussion of ecological theory to recast the parameters of
Neanderthal-modern human interaction and suggests that, as congruent
competitors, they likely coexisted in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
This perspective has the advantage of accounting for the very similar
archaeological signatures
of the two groups of hominins over tens of millennia, a situation
Hovers rightly emphasizes is quite distinct from that of Europe during
the transition interval.
In the next chapter, Bräuer presents a critical evaluation of claims
about the possibility of a substantial genetic contribution
of Neanderthals to the gene pool of early European
modern humans. He concludes that the identification of Neanderthal
features in Upper Paleolithic Homo sapiens is largely unconvincing,
based as it is on misleading assessment
of certain features and/or on using features which he considers
problematic. He concludes that there was likely only a very modest
amount of gene flow between the two groups. In Chapter 7, Hublin and
Bailey seek to address much the same issue, but approach it from the
opposite perspective, namely by looking for modern features in late
Neanderthals remains. They conclude that, especially when features
linked to strong genetic signals are given primacy, there is little
convincing evidence for interbreeding or in situ evolution towards
modern human morphology. The conclusions of these two studies stand in
notable contrast to those of Trinkaus and colleagues (Chapter 9) who
present
new details about the context and morphology of the Peºtera cu Oase
early modern human remains. These authors
conclude that the presence of archaic features in these specimens
indicates phylogenetic affinities to some kind of archaic hominin
group, likely Neanderthals.
Bocherens and Drucker (Chapter 8) present new stable isotope evidence
to address the question of Neanderthal and early modern human diet and
its inferential link to potential
dietary competition between the two groups. They complement their
analyses of hominin dietary patterns by
PaleoAnthropology 2008: 88-90. (c) Source PDF
Share/Bookmark

Latest in Underwater Archeology

U.S. Navy uses mine detection unmanned undersea craft to examine
possible underwater archaeological targets. Private and academic
interests at the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle fest (AUVfest) see the
three-D pictures the Navy's mine detection equipment supplies.

The (Rhode Island Historical Preservation and Heritage) commission
owns the four abandoned wrecks that the high-tech instruments were
sent to probe during the past two weeks. These included the British
frigates Cerberus and Lark, which were ordered scuttled when cornered
by larger French warships that came to the aid of America in 1778. The
other two wrecks included a wooden barge, off Prudence Island,
believed to be carrying granite blocks and a more modern steel ship.


Vessels offer glimpse of what lies beneath


01:00 AM EDT on Thursday, May 22, 2008


By Richard Salit


Journal Staff Writer


Brennan Phillips, an engineer, is onboard a torpedo weapon retriever
ship with the REMUS 600, which had been exploring the wreck of the
British ship Cerberus.


The Providence Journal Frieda Squires


NEWPORT — You won’t find any historic or dignified names on these
vessels, no USS John F. Kennedy or USS Saratoga.


Instead, the collection of sleek unmanned undersea craft on display
yesterday in a warehouse-style building at the Naval Undersea Warfare
Center bore the type of numbing technological acronyms — BPAUV, REMUS,
MARV and HAUV — you’d expect from the military and the scientists
gathered here to show them off.


While their names may be inscrutable, their purpose is clear: To
protect Navy vessels from hidden mines, the weapon that has wreaked
more damage and sunk more ships than all others combined. What isn’t
so obvious, however, is the devices’ practical applications,
particularly their ability to reveal what’s on, and beneath the sea
floor.


For the past two weeks, the Navy has brought together civilian and
military experts from around the country to demonstrate and test how
the high-tech apparatus can be used to help marine archaeologists. The
experiments have focused on several wrecks off the shores of Aquidneck
Island, including British warships scuttled in shallow waters during
the Revolutionary War.


“This is state-of-the-art stuff,” said D.K. Abbass, founding director
of the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology Project, which has been
searching for, and studying, shipwrecks in state waters since 1991.
“The images are just so much better.”


The event that has united Abbass and her fellow archaeologists with
military officials and technologists is AUVfest 2008, a periodic
gathering the Navy hosts to support the development of so-called
“autonomous undersea vehicles.” This is the first time since its
creation more than 10 years ago that AUVfest has been held in Newport.
It began May 12 and ends tomorrow.


Yesterday, the media was invited into the secretive and typically off-
limits Naval Undersea Warfare Center, while today Navy admirals and
nearly 200 other guests will get to tour the same areas. The highlight
of the event is a building on Narragansett Bay, where the collection
of undersea vessels is on display.


Most are yellow and look smooth and narrow like torpedoes. A few have
wings while one even has four fins, making it the only one “capable of
swimming and crawling,” according to a brochure. All have a variety of
imaging systems, such as sonar, that use acoustics or magnetics or
other properties to detect underwater objects. They weigh from 180 to
2,000 pounds.


The smallest of these, the HAUV, with its vaguely crab-like shape,
demonstrated its ability to closely survey a ship’s hull for
explosives. Its operators sent it under water to inspect the bottom of
the mothballed aircraft carrier Saratoga, tied to a pier near
AUVfest’s expo center.


“It moves without touching it,” said Jerome Vaganay, a spokesman for
its designer, Bluefin Robotics. It follows a precise pattern during an
inspection, he said, but “you can stop the vehicle with a joystick” to
have it focus on suspicious areas.


Those on hand came from government labs, private companies and
academic institutions, such as applied research labs at Pennsylvania
State University and the University of Texas, according to William H.
Schopfel, demonstration manager for the Navy’s Office of Naval
Research.


He and others emphasized the collaboration between the Navy, the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Ocean
Exploration and Research, the University of Rhode Island and area
archaeologists, including Abbass’ group and representatives of the
state Historical Preservation and Heritage Commission.


The commission owns the four abandoned wrecks that the high-tech
instruments were sent to probe during the past two weeks. These
included the British frigates Cerberus and Lark, which were ordered
scuttled when cornered by larger French warships that came to the aid
of America in 1778. The other two wrecks included a wooden barge, off
Prudence Island, believed to be carrying granite blocks and a more
modern steel ship.


During the week, information from the various undersea vehicles that
scrutinized the murky Bay waters was transmitted to a room at NUWC
equipped with computers and large monitors. There, operators sought to
instantly produce images of objects being studied and to create three-
dimensional maps of the underwater areas.


“The exercise is to see if we can use more technologies … to secure a
port as quickly as possible,” Schopfel said.


But other benefits include improved charts, detection of undersea
debris and abandoned fishing gear and archaeological discoveries.


“We found something that isn’t on the charts,” said Schopfel. “It is a
large piece of metal on the bottom.”


He showed yesterday’s audience numerous images of the sea floor that
showed ghostly, blurred objects and patterns. One, he said, was curved
and resembled an anchor while another was long and narrow and
metallic.


“Everyone is pretty much in agreement this is a cannon,” he said.


“The technology is very impressive and moves us forward in very
exciting ways,” Abbass said.

Arch News
Share/Bookmark

Orkney Islanders have Siberian relatives

Orkney Islanders have Siberian relatives


Last Updated: 12:01am BST 23/05/2008


A new study on ancient human migrations suggests that Orcadians and
Siberians are closely related, writes Roger Highfield.


Orkney Islanders are more closely related to people in Siberia and in
Pakistan than those in Africa and the near East, according to a novel
method to chart human migrations.
advertisement


The surprising findings come from a new way to infer ancient human
movements from the variation of DNA in people today, conducted by a
team from the University of Oxford and University College Cork, which
has pioneered a technique that analyses the entire human genetic
makeup, or genome.


Although it provides relative genetic contributions of one group to
another, rather than timings, it confirms how the first modern humans
came out of Africa 50,000 years ago, mostly from a group in southern
Africa called the San.


But the subsequent movements around the world, via the near east,
central Asia and then Europe, turned up some surprises including a
strong similarity between the Sindih, a people who once lived in
Pakistan, and Orkney Islanders, or Orcadians.


In turn, the Orcadians are closely related to the people who first
colonised Siberia.


"Reindeer herders (a people called the Yakut) are indeed unexpectedly
related to British, because one of their strongest signals of ancestry
is from Orcadians, the only British population in the sample" says Dr
Daniel Falush of University College Cork, a co-author on the paper in
the journal PLoS Genetics.


The Orcadians, or those closely related to them in central/northern
Europe, also contribute to two other North East Asian populations, the
Hezhen and Han from Northern China.


"Humans like to tell stories and amongst the most captivating is the
story of the global spread of modern humans from their original
homeland in Africa," says Dr Falush.


"Traditionally this has been the preserve of anthropologists but
geneticists are now starting to make an important contribution."


Previous methods have either concentrated on one part of the human
genetic code (for example, just the Y-chromosome) or a greatly
oversimplified model of heredity.


"Our technique enables us to identify more subtle details about
genetic contributions than other methods," says Dr Garrett Hellenthal
of the University of Oxford, a co-author.


"By incorporating the inheritance of 'blocks' of DNA between
generations, rather than just individual genes, it captures a
panoramic view of the sharing of patterns of DNA across the entire
human genome," he says.


"This allows us to consider a vast number of possible colonisation
scenarios - not just the ones people have already thought of - and use
an algorithm to determine the most likely migration routes."


The new technique was used to analyse 2540 genetic markers using DNA
data from 927 individuals of diverse ethnicity whose DNA was collected
by the Human Diversity Project.


The researchers believe their method can cope with much larger
datasets with over 500,000 genetic markers and are now working on a
detailed picture of migrations into Europe.

Source Article
Share/Bookmark

New research forces U-turn in population migration theory

Public release date: 23-May-2008


Contact: Jo Kelly
joke...@campuspr.co.uk


University of Leeds
New research forces U-turn in population migration theory


Research led by the University of Leeds has discovered genetic
evidence that overturns existing theories about human migration into
Island Southeast Asia (covering the Philippines, Indonesia and
Malaysian Borneo) - taking the timeline back by nearly 10,000 years.


Prevailing theory suggests that the present-day populations of Island
Southeast Asia (ISEA) originate largely from a Neolithic expansion
from Taiwan driven by rice agriculture about 4,000 years ago - the so-
called "Out of Taiwan" model.


However an international research team, led by the UK’s first
Professor of Archaeogenetics, Martin Richards, has shown that a
substantial fraction of their mitochondrial DNA lineages (inherited
down the female line of descent), have been evolving within ISEA for a
much longer period, possibly since modern humans arrived some 50,000
years ago.


Moreover, the lineage can be shown to have actually expanded in the
opposite direction - into Taiwan - within the last 10,000 years.


Says Professor Richards: “I think the study results are going to be a
big surprise for many archaeologists and linguists on whose studies
conventional migration theories are based. These population expansions
had nothing to do with agriculture, but were most likely to have been
driven by climate change - in particular, global warming and the
resulting sea-level rises at the end of the Ice Age between
15,000-7,000 years ago.”


At this time the ancient continent known as Sundaland – an extension
of the Asian landmass as far as Borneo and Java – was flooded to
create the present-day archipelago.


Although sea-level rise no doubt devastated many communities, it also
opened up a huge amount of new coastal territory for those who
survived(1). The present-day coastline is about twice as great as it
was 15,000 years ago.


“Our genetic evidence suggests that probably from about 12,000 years
ago these people began to recover from the natural catastophes and
expanded greatly in numbers, spreading out in all directions,
including north to Taiwan, west to the Southeast Asian mainland, and
east towards New Guinea. These migrations have not previously been
recognised archaeologically, but we have been able to show that there
is supporting evidence in the archaeological record too.”


###


The interdisciplinary research team comprised colleagues from Leeds,
Oxford, Glasgow, Australia and Taiwan. The study was funded by the
Bradshaw Foundation and the European Union Marie Curie Early Stage
Training program and is published in the current issue of Molecular
Biology and Evolution (MBE).
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, May 15, 2008

50,000 Year Old Find on Savannah River

Several pictures at the cite. Flood on the Savannah River forces
archaeologist Al Goodyear to leave Big Pine Tree site for Topper site.
Caveat: The source is the "alternative newspaper" for the Charleston,
SC area. It is a good "story", well-illustrated, but not written for a
technical audience.


Al Goodyear and the Secrets of the Ancient Americans
USC Professor Discovers 50,000 Year-Old Artifacts in S.C.
by : Ron Aiken


It was the summer of 1998, and University of South Carolina
archaeologist Al Goodyear had a problem on his hands.


Fourteen years of digging at an ancient chert quarry outside Allendale
had begun to bear fruit: At a site called Big Pine Tree, Goodyear was
well on his way to establishing that a substantial Clovis population
lived here. If you’ll recall your history lessons from high school,
the Clovis people — named such because the first evidence of them was
found at a site near Clovis, N.M. — were believed to be the first
Americans who came into the North American continent across the Bering
Sea land bridge from Asia some 13,000 years ago.


A volunteer carefully excavates a portion of the Topper site, being
careful to leave artifacts exactly where they were discovered to
catalog. Photo courtesy of USC


Now, thanks to a flood that had whipped the normally serene Savannah
River into a frenzy, Goodyear had to move his team, filled with
researchers and avid volunteers, away from the dig’s most prosperous
site to a backup location identified years earlier — Topper, named
after local man David Topper who first led Goodyear to the area in
1981.


Goodyear was less than thrilled about the move.


“We honestly had no place else to go,” Goodyear says. “Word was just
beginning to get out about the site, interest was high and now we
couldn’t dig where we wanted.


“Topper, which was higher up, was high and dry and was the only
choice. I remember it broke my heart at the time to leave behind a
site I thought was the best we’d find. I remember thinking ‘OK, I
guess we have to go to Topper.’”


What his team found that year and every year since has made it,
arguably, the most important archaeological site in North America,
with radiocarbon dating verifying human habitation at around 50,000
years ago — the oldest ever found.


And the site isn’t just for archaeologists: It is open for a dig now
through June 7, and volunteers can sign up to help by visiting
allendale-expedition.net. The dig will focus on both the 50,000 year-
old level and a massive new Clovis area discovered in 2004.


Because of Topper and a handful of other sites, in a matter of 10
years everything scholars thought they knew about who the first
Americans were, where they came from and when was wrong. Not just by a
little, but by nearly 40,000 years.


Topper is significant for other reasons, too: Evidence from the site,
published late last year, also supports the idea that a comet exploded
over the Great Lakes 12,900 years ago, scorching the entire Eastern
Seaboard through massive wildfires that would have left Columbia
nothing but ash and cinder and which led to the extinction of the
woolly mammoth and displaced the entire Clovis population.


And the best part?


Topper isn’t anywhere near finished giving up its ancient secrets.


Glossary


Chert: a sedimentary rock that flakes easily and can be worked to
produce tools such as knives, arrows, axes and blades.


Clovis: The common name for a hunting people believed to have come to
America via the Bering Sea land bridge around 13,000 years ago
following large game.


Paleoindian: The name given to ancient Native Americans living roughly
between 16,000 and 10,000 years ago following the end of the last Ice
Age.


Solutrean Theory: A theory that Clovis peoples entered America not
from Siberia but from Europe, making their way along the edge of the
ice sheets chasing marine mammals and fish.


Younger-Dryas: A 1,300-year period beginning approximately 12,900
years ago in which the Northern Hemisphere underwent a dramatic,
unexpected cooling period in which animals larger than 220 pounds
died.


The Gospel of Clovis First


Back at Topper in 1998 — and with time running out on the summer’s dig
— Goodyear had a decision to make. He remembered reading about a pre-
Clovis site in Monte Verde, Chile, the year before in which evidence
was found to substantiate a human presence around 14,500 years ago,
and an odd thought popped in his head.


“I thought if all the experts had agreed on that date and people were
in South America at that time, a thousand miles south and a thousand
years before, how could they have not been here?” Goodyear says. “How
could they miss a 20-million-year-old chert quarry on the Savannah
River, which has always been about the same place it is now and has a
relatively temperate climate like it does now?


“So I talked to my team about the Monte Verde find and asked them if
they wanted to dig deeper than anyone had before in America to see
what’s there. Of course, they don’t have to go to national meetings
and defend results, so they were all like, “Yeah! Let’s do it! We’ll
ruin your career!’


“To most people of my generation, saying you’re searching for
something pre-Clovis is tantamount to saying you’re going looking for
Elvis or E.T. It was that entrenched — it’s what I was taught myself
and what I taught my students to believe. And lo and behold the first
week we start finding artifacts.”


To understand why chert was so crucial to early man is simple: Its
properties enable anyone, with a little training, to fashion razor-
sharp stone blades to be used for axes, knives and arrows that were
critical to human survival. Knives cut through animal skin to make
clothes. Bigger tools are used to cut trees for fire and shelter.
Spears are used to hunt the game they chased, including woolly
mammoths. Smaller blades are used for everything from carving bone to
tattooing flesh.


Simply put, without a chert supply, which is to say without tools,
survival is nearly impossible. That’s what led Goodyear to the
Allendale chert quarry to begin with — there’s just no way ancient
peoples, especially in a warm climate with a river for food and
transportation, could have missed the benefits of living near the
Southeast’s largest exposed chert supply.


The roofed structure protects archaeologists and the dig from the heat
and elements. It was built through donations from Clariant Corp.,
which owns the land, and many others. Clariant also donated the
viewing platform so the public can watch the dig in progress. Photo
courtesy of USC


“That was a big psychological time of change for me, those last few
weeks of 1998,” Goodyear says. “We just kept finding more and more. As
a Clovis-first person myself, I had to re-evaluate what I thought I
knew against what I was holding in my hands. And once you accept that,
all of a sudden everything that came before it is fair game, too.”


Still buzzed from the pre-Clovis Topper findings, Goodyear wrote a
letter, which he had done every year once work was finished, to all
his volunteers thanking them for their efforts and letting them know
what they’d found.


“And all I said to them was that for two weeks we dug deeper and found
something under Clovis,” Goodyear says. “That’s all I said; I didn’t
call up newspapers or anything. I just shared it with them.”


An eager volunteer, aware of research being done in Pennsylvania by
archaeologist James Adovasio, faxed a copy of the letter to him. As
fate would have it, Adovasio happened to be working with U.S. News &
World Report writer Tom Petit for an upcoming cover story, and when
Adovasio shared the information with Petit, the reporter wasted no
time calling Goodyear.


“I told him what we found, and next thing I know we’re splashed all
through the article,” Goodyear says. “Topper wasn’t a secret anymore.”


Dating the Evidence


Despite the growing evidence of artifacts, Goodyear knew if he was
ever going to mollify critics, he needed precise dates no one could
argue with. In 2000, Goodyear welcomed scientists from across the
country to come and collect radiocarbon samples for dating as well as
a geochronologist who specialized in using optically stimulated
luminescence (OSL) methods to date the soil itself. Their research
confirmed the first solid pre-Clovis date at Topper to between 16,000
and 20,000 years ago.


“At that point, the big boys started getting interested that we had
dates for 20,000 [years ago] that were done by some of the best people
in the country,” Goodyear says. “Finally, we had that baseline we
needed for the rest of the scientific community to examine.”


One of those scientists was Dennis Stanford. As curator of archaeology
for the Smithsonian Institution, his word carries serious weight in
the field.


“At the time, I was very interested in Al’s work,” Stanford says.
“Al’s recognized as a good, solid archaeologist. He’s not a crackpot —
when Al speaks, we tend to listen. I was quite pleased to hear that he
was considering examining lower levels and had found something.
“But I also remember thinking that I was glad Al was doing it and not
me. The Clovis-first model was the accepted thinking for close to a
century, a 60-year deadlock mold, and we realized that what it was was
a theory, not proof. And as proof started to come, I think people just
couldn’t deny it any longer.


“So finally we have people agreeing that yes, a certain people did
come over the land bridge. What we didn’t know is that it just so
happens there were people already here when they did it. It made us
all realize just how little we knew and know about America’s past.”


By 2002-03, Goodyear was set upon the task of accumulating evidence to
support his earlier dates, though he continued digging ever downward.
In 2003 he hit a white sand layer that was hard as concrete and, as he
dug slowly deeper, began noticing what looked like artifacts sticking
out of it. In 2004, The New York Times sent its top science writer,
Pulitzer-prize winner John Noble Wilford, down to investigate, and
that same year Goodyear found a layer of charcoal in it to date.


What came back, just like in 1998, blew him away yet again.


The typical Clovis spear point, evidence of a technology so effective
in hunting it was the WMD of its day. Photo by Daryl P. Miller,
S.C.I.A.A.


“I was hoping that dating would bring back numbers around 25,000 years
ago,” Goodyear says. “That was a date people could probably swallow.


“But no, I have to get back dates of 50,000 years ago, which according
to the dating and amount of error means that no matter what it’s at
least 40,000, if not much more. I was in an awkward position. Here are
artifacts we know are tools, here are the dates we know are accurate
and here I go again, getting up there in front of creation, on CNN
announcing a 50,000 date, the oldest radiocarbon dated site in North
America.


“Just as I had gotten people accustomed to 15-16,000, here I come
again. I had a lot of people blanch at the 50,000, but I told them it
was my opinion, take it or leave it, and people have done both.”


What most troubles people about Homo sapiens occupying South Carolina
50,000 years ago is, obviously, how did they get there? Commonly
accepted dates have the first Homo sapiens coming out of Africa around
70,000 years ago, making their way as far east as Australia by 50,000
year ago. To have made the East Coast by that time means either they
moved a lot more quickly than was believed possible, they left Africa
earlier than previously thought or they came a different route
altogether.


That’s where Stanford comes in. Since 1999, he has proposed a theory
of coastal migration called the Solutrean Theory, which contends that
early man made his way from Iberia, not Siberia, by following the ice
across from Europe and Greenland to North America between 17,000 and
21,000 years ago.


“Boats were the key,” Stanford says. “People say, ‘Well, why aren’t we
finding evidence of ancient boats and settlements?’ That’s because
those coastal settlements are now under hundreds of feet of water
because ancient sea levels were much lower. In the time period we’re
talking about, the coasts were up to 60-70 miles out to sea from where
they are now.


“Just a week or so ago we found out that some mastodon remains dredged
up in the 1970s off the coast of Virginia had a bi-pointed projectile
point embedded in it from material in North Carolina. People aren’t
willing to imagine cavemen out on the sea in boats, but that’s just a
crock of hooey. We know boats have been around from 40,000 to 60,000
years. They absolutely were, chasing oil-rich seals and mammals they
needed to survive.


“The food was on the water, and that’s where the people went. We have
to stop seeing the ocean and rivers as barriers. They weren’t
barriers, they were highways.”


Goodyear likes Stanford’s coastal-migration theory, though Stanford
admits that 50,000 years is “too early for our guys” coming from the
Iberian Peninsula.


“The key is to figure out how they got here. We know that people were
around 100,00 years ago, so there is a population that is available.
But I’m glad that’s for others to figure out.”


Source: Wikimedia.org, supplemented with information from Al Goodyear
and Dennis Stanford.


Topper Now: Comets, Clovis and Extinction


Allen West often visualizes the scene.


Clovis hunters, well established in places like Allendale, look up one
morning to a scene few have ever witnessed. Flashing across the sky
are streaks of fire, literally tearing the atmosphere apart. Then, a
series of explosions so loud they could be heard for thousands of
miles, followed closely after by a fireball that would have set most
of North America from the Atlantic to the Pacific on fire.


“To start with, people would have been able to see these objects
coming for some time before they hit, just extremely bright,” says
West, a geophysicist from Arizona who used the Topper site to help
pioneer research that only in the last couple of years solved the
ancient mystery of what caused a mass extinction in America
approximately 12,900 years ago.


“It was most likely a fragmented comet, and it would have stretched
across the sky for thousands of miles. Then, the explosions — it would
have been like the atmosphere became a boiler. The only thing I can
think of is to imagine what it’s like to be in a nuclear exchange, one
explosion after another after another. It would have been a canopy of
fire from horizon to horizon in all directions.”


Scientists have long known that for some reason, much of the flora and
most of the large animals in North America — including the woolly
mammoth — went extinct in a very short time. Many ascribed the die-off
to overhunting by Clovis peoples, disease, abrupt climate change or a
combination of the three.


West wasn’t buying it, and turned to what was known: Just as America
was warming itself following the last Ice Age 13,000 years ago, a
temperature reversal sparked a 1,000-year cold period, known as the
Younger-Dryas interval. West believed only a comet or volcano could
have initiated a nuclear winter-type effect, and no volcanic culprit
fit the bill.


“We had reason to believe, markers, that showed us that it’s possible
a comet exploded over the Great Lakes area around 12,900 years ago,”
West says. “We knew that most every animal over 220 pounds died, and
only animals less than 220 pounds lived.


“What we needed to find were sites that were at that established
Clovis level and look for evidence of an impact. Only a few, like
Topper, were active, so we went looking and got in touch with Al.”


Goodyear remembers the conversation well.


“Allen came down in 2005 and said he was looking for extraterrestrial
markers here,” Goodyear says. “And it’s at a time after I’ve announced
50,000 years and I’m thinking to myself, ‘Wow, this is all I need,
someone really looking for E.T.’”


West recalls a similar exchange.


“Al is a friendly guy who is always willing to listen, and he listened
politely but was skeptical,” West says. “But as we began to find
markers in the form of nanodiamonds and magnetic microspherules, we
all began to get excited. There is no other natural function that
produces these things besides an extraterrestrial event.”


With evidence of both the explosion and mass fires, West, who also
postulates that the popular “Carolina Bays” formations are related to
this ancient event, got together with Goodyear to see whether and how
Clovis people would have been impacted.


“Obviously, if it’s not good for animals over 220 pounds, it’s not
going to be so hot for humans, either.”


That’s when Goodyear decided to look into it on his own.


“I went back and re-examined our South Carolina paleopoint database,
and found that Clovis points dropped off significantly after that date
until the advent of what we call the Redstone people,” Goodyear says.
“It was about a four-to-one drop-off, which doesn’t make sense just
because it had gotten cold. It was suspicious. These are people who
have survived ice ages, and yet I found similar, if not even more
drastic drop-offs in points in North Carolina and Virginia. I kind of
timidly laid those facts out there to them and they were able to use
it.”
With that information, West could begin to argue that the event
absolutely took its toll on Clovis, either wiping them out or driving
them off for some thousand years.


“That was solely Al Goodyear that led us to that,” West says. “Lo and
behold he found it, and that was really because Topper is such a
fantastic Clovis site besides its pre-Clovis value.
“Al’s reputation has been essential; he’s been one of our great team
members. We had 26 co-authors for the paper, each of whom brought
something essential, and Topper was key for us because it’s so well
known and investigated.”


Goodyear can’t say for sure what Topper has in store, only that it
isn’t nearly as excavated as it could be.


“Topper is like a box of chocolates, as Forest Gump says,” Goodyear
says. “You never know what you’re going to get out of it.


“The idea that we could have found stuff at 50,000 years, that blew my
mind. It’s now a matter of collecting more artifacts; it’ll be a while
before we’re able to overwhelm people.


“As someone who was Clovis-first, to find and accept not just pre-
Clovis but pre- pre- pre-Clovis, that’s something else. It’s a stretch
to get people to realize that there once were woolly mammoths walking
down Main Street, that there were people walking around here 50,000
years ago, but it’s true.


“Though it took the Savannah River to chase me to Topper, I’m glad it
worked out how it did. I’ve learned not to say that Topper has
finished giving up its secrets.”
Free Times Article
Archeology news Story
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Turkish site a Neolithic 'supernova'

news.google.com

Turkish site a Neolithic 'supernova'


April 21, 2008


By Nicholas Birch - URFA, Turkey - As a child, Klaus Schmidt used to
grub around in caves in his native Germany in the hope of finding
prehistoric paintings. Thirty years later, as a member of the German
Archaeological Institute, he found something infinitely more
important: a temple complex almost twice as old as anything
comparable.


"This place is a supernova," said Mr. Schmidt, standing under a lone
tree on a windswept hilltop 35 miles north of the Syrian border.


"Within a minute of first seeing it, I knew I had two choices: go away
and tell nobody, or spend the rest of my life working here."


Behind him are the first folds of the Anatolian Plateau. Ahead, the
Mesopotamian plain, like a dust-colored sea, stretches south hundreds
of miles to Baghdad and beyond. The stone circles of Gobekli Tepe, his
workplace since 1994, are just in front, hidden under the brow of the
hill.


Compared with Stonehenge, they are humble affairs. None of the circles
that have been excavated, four out of an estimated 20, is more than
100 feet across. Two of the slender, T-shaped pillars tower at least
three feet above their peers.


What makes them remarkable are the carved reliefs of boars, foxes,
lions, birds, snakes and scorpions that cover them, and their age.
Dated at about 9500 B.C., these stones are 5,500 years older than the
first cities of Mesopotamia and 7,000 years older than Stonehenge.


Nevermind wheels or writing, the people who erected them did not even
have pottery or domesticated wheat. They lived in villages, but were
hunters, not farmers.


"Everybody used to think only complex, hierarchical civilizations
could build such monumental sites and that they only came about with
the invention of agriculture," said Ian Hodder, a Stanford University
anthropology professor who has directed digs at Catalhoyuk, Turkey's
most-famous Neolithic site, since 1993.


"Gobekli changes everything. It's elaborate, it's complex, and it is
pre-agricultural. That fact alone makes the site one of the most
important archaeological finds in a very long time."


With only a fraction of the site opened after a decade of excavation,
Gobekli Tepe's significance to the people who built it remains
unclear. Some think it was the center of a fertility rite, with the
two tall stones at the center of each circle representing a man and
woman.


Urfa's tourist board has taken that theory up with alacrity; visit the
Garden of Eden, its brochures trumpet, see Adam and Eve.


Mr. Schmidt, however, is skeptical. He agreed the site could well have
been "the last flowering of a semi-nomadic world that farming was just
about to destroy" and pointed out that if it is in near-perfect
condition today, it is because those who built it buried it soon after
under tons of soil, as though its wild animal-rich world had lost all
meaning.


However, the site is devoid of the fertility symbols that have been
found at other Neolithic sites, and the T-shaped columns, while
clearly semi-human, are sexless.


"I think here we are face to face with the earliest representation of
gods," according to Mr. Schmidt.


"They have no eyes, no mouths, no faces. But they have arms, and they
have hands. They are makers."


"In my opinion, the people who carved them were asking themselves the
biggest questions of all. What is this universe? Why are we here?"


With no evidence of houses or graves near the stones, Mr. Schmidt
thinks the hilltop was a site of pilgrimage for communities within a
radius of roughly 100 miles. He notes how the tallest stones all face
southeast, as if scanning plains that are scattered with contemporary
sites in many ways no less remarkable than Gobekli Tepe.


Last year, for instance, French archaeologists working at Djade al-
Mughara in northern Syria uncovered the oldest mural ever found — "two
square meters of geometric shapes, in red, black and white — a bit
like a Paul Klee painting," according to Eric Coqueugniot, the
University of Lyon archaeologist who is leading the excavation.


Mr. Coqueugniot describes Mr. Schmidt's hypothesis that Gobekli Tepe
was a meeting point for feasts, rituals and sharing ideas as
"tempting," given the site's spectacular position. He warned, though,
that surveys of the region are still in their infancy and that
"tomorrow, somebody might find somewhere even more dramatic."


Vecihi Ozkaya, the director of a dig at Korpiktepe, on the Tigris
River 120 miles east of Urfa, doubts that the thousands of stone pots
he has found since 2001, in hundreds of 11,500-year-old graves,
qualify as such.


Nevertheless, his excitement fills his austere office at Dicle
University in Diyarbakir.


"Look at this," he said, pointing at a photo of an exquisitely carved
sculpture showing an animal, half-human and half-lion. "It's a sphinx,
thousands of years before Egypt. Southeastern Turkey, northern Syria —
this region saw the wedding night of our civilization."
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Appeal for Stan Gooch


AN URGENT APPEAL TO HELP
THE ACCLAIMED AUTHOR,
STAN GOOCH
by Brent Logan

brentlogan@mindspring.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE IGNOBLEST PRIZE
Prodigious visionaries rarely gift us, even more so when their concepts are grounded in prolific research, compelling lines of reason, and lucid expression: From the merely good, greatness arises. However, too often history has been hard with these resources, and the plight of Stan Gooch is an immediate example.

Highly praised by authors such as Jacquetta Hawkes, Colin Wilson, and Brian Aldiss, the Literary Review has called him ?one of the most formidable and consistent thinkers alive today.? With more than a dozen books (see menu above)--and some two million published words--all proposing novelty like few writers of his generation or after, Stan Gooch, now age 70, is living in the most reduced circumstances . . . through nothing but an ironic fate.

Despite powerful media esteem for his controversial volumes, nothwithstanding a ceaseless workload investigating the dual nature of Homo sapiens, after an impoverished existence this dedicated cultural asset remains virtually destitute--even though the establishment that consistently pilloried him is finally coming around to his profound ideas. While some conclusions may at first seem outlandish, it is impossible to fault the spadework, methodology, and sheer ingenuity Stan Gooch has brought to a wide range of sciences.

In 1976, after being overwhelmed by the originality and rigor of his masterwork, Total Man: An Evolutionary Theory of Personality, I approached the author, and an aspiring writer was rewarded by a very generous critical boost; while I have been sorely derelict in contacting him no more than a few times since (but always receiving kindly replies), perhaps my own seniority has heightened conscience, hence this plea. My sincerest hope is that in small measure good will can be returned to one who has aided so many . . . probably our leading cultural and anthropological psychologist, recalling Joseph Campbell, congruent with William Irwin Thompson.

I implore any open mind to review the following record--an astonishing performance--then roadtest a book by Stan Gooch (www.InnerTraditions.com and www.crowstreetpress.com have reprinted some, www.amazon.com offers several, www.abebooks.com many more, or try local libraries), yet know that he has been marginalized to a rented caravan in a nearly abandoned Welsh trailer park--with neither telephone nor computer, his correspondence inked on the backs of galley proofs, and scarce personal contact--wholly lacking family, right at life's raw edge.

No one, certainly not a global treasure whose brilliance has inflected our deepest understanding of what we are, deserves this. All he wants is the opportunity whereby a final opus by him can draw together everything he has written; please help give him that chance. Monetary contributions or correspondence alone would be a godsend, his heartfelt acknowledgement returned by mail:



Mr. Stan Gooch
36 Oakland Park
Ystrad Road
Fforestfach
Swansea SA5 4BY
Wales, U.K.


Click Here for the Source Site
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

The Dream Culture of the Neanderthals: Guardians of the Ancient Wisdom

Reading this book was like a validation for many ideas I've had about our prehistoric past. Finally I have found a scholar who sees what I see in the depths of prehistory! Woodwoses, ogres and trolls.... dwarves, sidhe and fay...all come from real encounters some 35,000 to 10,000 years ago. And Neanderthal was not completely exterminated from the face of the Earth, but did indeed breed with homo sapien. Only the most extreme neanderthals, the classic neanderthals of inner europe, actually became extinct.
Though the book is somewhat dated, a student of modern anthropology can easily gain great insight by allowing that Gooch's definition of "neanderthal" is much broader than what we currently define as such.


Gooch understands that we're hybrids, and bolsters the arguement for multiregionalism. If one were to change his Neanderthal 1 to Heidelberg and Sons, (Heidelberg, Idaltu, Neanderthal, Classic Neanderthal, etc) and his Neanderthal 2 to Erectus and Sons (the asian ones, not ergaster), and his Northern Indian cro-magnon ancestors to Antecessor and Sons, then we might have a more updated version of the theory. Personally, I'd like to add that all of the above could have very easilly been hybrids; not just us.
Hybrids of hybrids of hybrids. Because erectus was mating with antecessor was shagging ergaster was loving habilis, and they might even invited rudolphensis every third month on the full moon. We are a species that likes to do other species, and not even always just primates, so it shouldn't be so surprising to these scientists. It's going to happen, and every once and a while it's gonna work in a reproductive sense, because all these species of hominid are very close to one another. We just had too many chances for it not to work sometimes with one brand of hominid or the other.
What's more we're pack animals; nomadic, sometimes even herding. We've been migrating out of Africa along the coast to Sundaland and then getting flooded out and sent back to Africa for millions of years, and to Europe and back for almost as long do to the shifting glaciers. Europe and Sundaland were and are natural evolutionary machines.

Yes, somewhere there was a bottleneck, and some other as of yet unknown anomalies, that make it hard for us to figure out the genetic trail. But if our mother is only 180,000 years old, then she had at least a little bit of all of the above in her. When genetics discounts neanderthal man, it doesn't account for any crossover before 180,000. It doesn't consider that only one sex of a species may have survived. When comparing modern man's DNA to that of a 27,000 year old hominid, they don't consider that traces which are extinct today may not have been extinct 1000 years ago, or 10,000. Genocide happens repeatedly throughout history.

But this book is not so much anthropological as cultural and psychological. The author provides us with observations that only one of his varied disciplines could summon. For in addition to brilliant sociological, archeological, and anthropological insights, Gooch provides us with excellent insights into the ancient religion of the Neanderthals, as well as the origin of many of our more well-known fairy tales, myths and legends. Painstakingly researched and innovative in its understanding, this is an essential book for those who are curious about the true origins of our culture and species.

Share/Bookmark

Monday, April 7, 2008

Archaeological finds dated to 35,000 years

Archaeological finds dated to 35,000 years


Jan Mayman
April 7, 2008Advertisement


ANCIENT Aboriginal tools found on a Pilbara mine site in Western
Australia have been dated at 35,000 years -- among the oldest so far
discovered in Australia.


Archaeologists believe the dig could yield material up to 40,000 years
old, comparable with the internationally famous Lake Mungo Man
discovery in NSW.


The prehistoric dwelling place is on the multibillion-dollar Hope
Downs iron ore mine site about 160 kilometres from the outback town of
Newman and 310 kilometres south of Port Hedland. It is jointly run by
international mining giant Rio Tinto and Gina Rinehart's Hancock
Prospecting.


Archaeologists hired by the Aboriginal traditional owners have
released the results of radiocarbon tests indicating that it is one of
the oldest-dated sites in Australia and internationally significant as
a prehistoric record of humanity.


"We have always known this is an important part of our history, that
our ancestors lived here," said a senior elder of the Martidja
Banyjima people, Slim Parker.


"Our stories and songs tells us this. It is a good feeling to know
archaeologists have proved what we say is true. It makes us feel
strong. Now we want this place preserved. It is part of our heritage
and our culture."


The discovery shows Mr Parker's ancestors lived in the area for more
than 1000 generations.


The Banyjimas' consultant archaeologist Neale Draper said: "We are
thrilled at the test results. This is a major scientific discovery. It
contains a large number of stone tools and it is one of the most data-
rich ancient sites in Australia, with an exceptional amount of
information about climate change through the last ice age, the
earliest occupation of the Pilbara and North-West Australia."


Discussions are now under way between the company and the traditional
owners, who want the sensitive areas protected from mining.


Melbourne University's Professor Jim Bowler, who discovered bones on
the shores of Lake Mungo in the late 1960s -- later estimated to be
40,000 years old, making them the oldest human remains found in
Australia -- said: "This appears to be a very, very important find. It
seems likely to write a new chapter in the history of Aboriginal
Australia."


Another eminent scholar, Dr Ian Crawford, former curator of
archaeology and anthropology at the West Australian Museum, said:
"Further work on this site is most important."


Dr Crawford said the discovery of ancient tools was especially
significant. Analysis of seed remains on the artefacts might be able
to settle a long debate among archaeologists about the date that
grinding implements were first used by Australia's indigenous people.


"It will be very interesting to see if this work can be related in any
way to rock engravings in the area," he said.


So far, no human remains have been found near the the dig site, but
the archaeologists and Aboriginal elders have found other caves in the
area that appear to have been deliberately walled in, and could be
burial places.


"Some of these niches are empty. They are being investigated with
great care and respect," Dr Draper said.


The sheer antiquity and quality of the material was amazing, he said.
"This is a forensic record of the history of indigenous Australia,
especially in the Pilbara.


"The cave is a rock shelter measuring 10 by eight metres, with a roof
1.5 metres high. The 1.5-metre excavation pit goes down 2.2 metres to
the bedrock below, and there is evidence of Aboriginal occupation down
to two metres deep," he said.


Twelve other sites in the area have also yielded archaeological
evidence such as stone tools, fireplaces and dateable charcoal as well
as plant remains such as seeds and bark. Another 20 have still to be
excavated.


Most of the stone tools are small cutting implements. Some were found
beside a fireplace containing charcoal dated as 25,000 years old.


Traces of organic material on the tools could provide evidence of
prehistoric food supplies and climate change when further testing is
complete.


"The most significant artefacts we found are a core (piece of stone)
and two flakes (from it) at the site layer dated to 35,000 years ago,"
Dr Draper said.


"The reason these are significant is because the flakes refit onto the
core. This demonstrates the way early Aboriginal peoples manufactured
stone artefacts."


Since these artefacts refitted together, it showed that the site had
not been previously disturbed. "We now hope Rio will redesign the mine
to protect this site, so that we can begin a major salvage operation,"
he said.


Dr Draper is managing director of Australian Cultural Heritage
Management Ltd, a national consultancy. He said carbon dating of
artefacts was done at the University of Waikato in New Zealand, which
has state-of-the-art carbon dating equipment.


The dig was supervised by a leading US archaeologist W. Boone Law, who
said it was the most significant project he had ever worked on.


"The oldest-dated stone artefacts are a core and associated flakes
that have a radiocarbon age estimate of 35,000 years," he said.


"There are at least 12 stone artefacts buried up to 10 centimetres
below the 35,000 year date, inferring the site is much older. We do
not know the age of the earliest artefacts, but based on the rock
shelter stratigraphy, it is likely around 40,000 years.


"When we were excavating, we recovered most of the artefacts below the
charcoal we dated to 25,000 years BP -- before present."


Mr Law said ancient campfires like the one in the cave shelter were
identified by observing the outline of old hearths during digging.


"The outline of the campfires are defined by a dense concentration of
ash, charcoal and burnt rock surrounded by unburnt soil," he said.
"The soil surrounding the hearth will be a lighter colour. Often there
is burned rock at the base of a campfire, demonstrating that the fire
burned in place or in situ."


He said the site was of great international importance. "I know that
the scientific value of this rock shelter will be emphasised across
the wider academic community, but for me personally, my memories of
excavating this site will always be tied to working with the Banyjima
people," Mr Law said.


"A team of elders and young men worked alongside ACHM staff throughout
this project, and their field observations added a new dimension to
our research."


"Their perspectives on the archaeological record and natural
enthusiasm for looking after country are forever linked to the history
of this place."


This story was found at:

Share/Bookmark

Friday, April 4, 2008

Oldest European

Why are scientists so devoid of common sense?
Here we've got some beakers saying that because they've found a homo antecedent 900,000 years old in Western Europe, that he must not be our ancestor.
However, earlier reports claimed that antecedent's face is closer to ours than any other species of hominid, even heidelbergensis and neanderthal
They are saying that since he's so old, he could have been Neanderthals ancestor but not ours.
Remember that Neanderthal was born only 150,000 years before we were, and that we're talking a million years of time here, or more. Hmmm...homo erectus is 2 million years old...does that mean we couldn't have evolved from them? I guess we did come from outer space!
Sigh...
And what about Heidelberg, huh? The previous theory was that Heidelberg seperated into Neanderthal and Modern. Are they gonna try to sweep that under the rug with "evolutionary dead end" or try to say H. is the sole progenitor of HSS? Better not do that- Heidelberg was in Europe and they want the origin of mankind to be in Africa! In any case, it would be really bad to have it in Europe.

It's simple. Hybrid-origin Multiregionalism, people. Since every science but genetics says so with preponderous amounts of evidence, it is time to re-evaluate how accurate our genetic tools are and how we are choosing to interpret their data.


I just read Stan gooch and he's the closest to right I've seen, except
I'd change his Neanderthal 1 to Heidelberg and Sons, (Heidelberg,
Idaltu, Neanderthal, Classic Neanderthal, etc) and his Neanderthal 2
to Erectus and Sons. His Northern Indian cro-magnon ancestors I'd
instead call Antecessor and Sons. And then I'd like to propose that
all of the above could have very easilly been hybrids; not just us.
Hybrids of hybrids of hybrids. Because erectus was shagging ergaster was banging habilis was balling antecessor, and they might have even invited rudolphensis on full moon threesome night. We are a species that likes to do other species, and not always just primates. It's gonna happen, and every once and a while it's gonna work. What's more we're pack animals; nomadic, sometimes even herding. We've been migrating out of Africa along the coast to Sundaland and then getting flooded out and sent back to Africa for millions of years, and to europe and back for almost as long do to the shifting glaciers. Europe and Sundaland were and are natural evolutionary machines. And somewhere there was a bottleneck, and some
other as of yet unknown anomalies, that make it hard for us to figure
out the genetic trail. If our mother is only 180,000 years old, then she had at least a little of all of the above in her.


Here's the article:


Humans in Europe At 1.2 mya Options


An analysis of an ancient jaw and teeth has confirmed that humans reached Western
Europe well over a million years ago, far earlier than previously thought.


The prehistoric fossils were excavated last June at Atapuerca in northern Spain,
along with stone tools used for butchering meat.
...
The individual has been labeled a Homo antecessor—a species first named in 1997
based on other human fossils found at Atapuerca. The sex isn't known, but the new
human was likely aged between 30 and 40 at the time of death.


The new findings suggest that H. antecessor was most probably unique to Europe,
the researchers say.
...
For example, 32 stone flints also excavated from the cave date to the same age as
the fossils, according to dig co-director José Maria Bermúdez de Castro of the
National Research Center on Human Evolution in Burgos, Spain.


The flints include simple tools that were likely used by the early humans to hack
up mammal carcasses and get at bone marrow, as evidenced by cut marks found on
nearby limb bones belonging to unidentified herbivores.


"They used the stone tools to take meat off animals, cut the muscles, and break
their bones," Bermúdez de Castro said. "The bones show the marks of these
implements."


Remains of other close-by animals—including rhinoceroses, deer, bison, lynx, wolves,
and bears—were also used to help date the fossils, the study said.


"Since we now know those fossils date to 900,000 [years ago], the time difference
is not great, and, provisionally at least, I think it's logical to assign the
mandible to Homo antecessor," Bermúdez de Castro said.
...
The Spanish-led team adds that the new fossil human likely marks the beginnings of
a native European species represented by the younger finds at Atapuerca.


"We see that these fossils are different from other populations in Asia or in
Africa," Bermúdez de Castro said.


"We think that when populations come to an extreme part of a continent, or to an
island, a process of speciation usually occurs," he added. "This is very normal in
the animal world."


The Atapuerca researchers in 1997 had suggested Homo antecessor as a possible
ancestor of modern humans. But the age of the new fossil find makes this theory
less likely, Bermúdez de Castro admitted.


"Homo antecessor may be very, very old in Europe, and modern humans came from
Africa," he said, making the previous theory "difficult to support."


More likely, Homo antecessor gave rise to Neandertals (often spelled Neanderthals)
in Europe, he said, adding, "it's a good hypothesis to test in the future."

Humans in Europe At 1.2 mya Options
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, April 3, 2008

OLDEST BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF FIRST AMERICANS FOUND

Archaeologists in Oregon have found fossilized human feces that appear
to be the oldest biological evidence of humans in North America. The
feces or coprolites in archaeological terms date back to 12,500 BCE,
pre-dating the Clovis people by 1000 years. DNA analysis of the
coprolites show the folks who lived in a cave in Oregon at 12,500 BCE
are closely related to modern Native Americans and come from Eastern
Asia. The coprolites were uncovered at Paisley Caves, 220 miles from
Portland.

There is some controversy in the findings since there were traces of
wolves, coyotes and foxes found in the coprolites as well meaning that
there could be some question about the actual age of the human DNA in
the coprolites.

Seattle Times

Mike Ruggeri
Clovis News
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

'Sodom and Gomorrah' asteroid

Cuneiform clay tablet translated for the first time
Press release issued 31 March 2008

A cuneiform clay tablet that has puzzled scholars for over 150 years has been translated for the first time. The tablet is now known to be a contemporary Sumerian observation of an asteroid impact at Köfels, Austria and is published in a new book, A Sumerian Observation of the Köfels’ Impact Event.
The giant landslide centred at Köfels in Austria is 500m thick and five kilometres in diameter and has long been a mystery since geologists first looked at it in the 19th century. The conclusion drawn by research in the middle 20th century was that it must be due to a very large meteor impact because of the evidence of crushing pressures and explosions. But this view lost favour as a much better understanding of impact sites developed in the late 20th century. In the case of Köfels there is no crater, so to modern eyes it does not look as an impact site should look. However, the evidence that puzzled the earlier researchers remains unexplained by the view that it is just another landslide.

This new research by Alan Bond, Managing Director of Reaction Engines Ltd and Mark Hempsell, Senior Lecturer in Astronautics at Bristol University, brings the impact theory back into play. It centres on another 19th century mystery, a Cuneiform tablet in the British Museum collection No K8538 (known as “the Planisphere”). It was found by Henry Layard in the remains of the library in the Royal Place at Nineveh, and was made by an Assyrian scribe around 700 BC. It is an astronomical work as it has drawings of constellations on it and the text has known constellation names. It has attracted a lot of attention but in over a hundred years nobody has come up with a convincing explanation as to what it is.

With modern computer programmes that can simulate trajectories and reconstruct the night sky thousands of years ago the researchers have established what the Planisphere tablet refers to. It is a copy of the night notebook of a Sumerian astronomer as he records the events in the sky before dawn on the 29 June 3123 BC (Julian calendar). Half the tablet records planet positions and cloud cover, the same as any other night, but the other half of the tablet records an object large enough for its shape to be noted even though it is still in space. The astronomers made an accurate note of its trajectory relative to the stars, which to an error better than one degree is consistent with an impact at Köfels.

The observation suggests the asteroid is over a kilometre in diameter and the original orbit about the Sun was an Aten type, a class of asteroid that orbit close to the earth, that is resonant with the Earth’s orbit. This trajectory explains why there is no crater at Köfels. The in coming angle was very low (six degrees) and means the asteroid clipped a mountain called Gamskogel above the town of Längenfeld, 11 kilometres from Köfels, and this caused the asteroid to explode before it reached its final impact point. As it travelled down the valley it became a fireball, around five kilometres in diameter (the size of the landslide). When it hit Köfels it created enormous pressures that pulverised the rock and caused the landslide but because it was no longer a solid object it did not create a classic impact crater.

Mark Hempsell, discussing the Köfels event, said: “Another conclusion can be made from the trajectory. The back plume from the explosion (the mushroom cloud) would be bent over the Mediterranean Sea re-entering the atmosphere over the Levant, Sinai, and Northern Egypt.

“The ground heating though very short would be enough to ignite any flammable material – including human hair and clothes. It is probable more people died under the plume than in the Alps due to the impact blast.“

The full translation of the tablet together with the analysis supporting these conclusions can be found in the book, A Sumerian Observation of the Kofels’ Impact Event published by Alcin Academics, ISBN 1904623646, priced at £12.99.


Source Article
Share/Bookmark